MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2502758441 · doi:10.1109/icc.1991.162428

Error performance of multiple symbol differential detection of PSK signals transmitted over correlated Rayleigh fading channels

2002· article· en· W2502758441 on OpenAlexaff
P. Ho, D. Fung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPairwise error probabilityFadingPhase-shift keyingAlgorithmRayleigh fadingDecoding methodsDetectorMathematicsChannel (broadcasting)DemodulationKeyingMetric (unit)Computer scienceBit error rateStatisticsTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A study is made of the error performance of multiple-symbol differential detection of uncoded PSK (phase shift keying) signals transmitted over correlated flat Rayleigh fading channels. It is found that the optimal detector uses a decoding metric which is a quadratic form of Gaussian variates. By using the characteristic function/residue theorem approach, the authors are able to derive an exact expression for the pairwise error event probability for the optimal detector. Subsequently, it is found that multiple-symbol differential detection is a very effective strategy for eliminating the irreducible error floor commonly associated with conventional differential detection. It is also found that the error performances of these detectors are not very sensitive to the mismatch between the decoding metric and the channel fading statistics.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207