MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2502778275 · doi:10.1109/itec.2016.7520199

Design and optimization of fractional slot concentrated winding permanent magnet machines for class IV electric vehicles

2016· article· en· W2502778275 on OpenAlexaff
Tanvir Rahman, Rodrigo Silva, Kieran Humphries, Mohammad Hossain Mohammadi, David A. Lowther

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomotive engineeringElectric vehicleSynchronous motorMulti-objective optimizationMagnetElectric motorElectromagnetic coilDriving cyclePower (physics)EngineeringClass (philosophy)AC motorComputer scienceMechanical engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The design, optimization and application of a number of surface mounted fractional slot concentrated winding (FSCW) electric machines for application to Class IV electric vehicles have been considered. Four FSCW motors with nominal power ratings of 50, 65, 75 and 100 kW have been designed. The motors were optimized using a novel multi-objective optimization strategy which allows a large numbers of objectives to be considered while ensuring computational efficiency and Pareto optimality. Vehicle simulations were carried out using the optimized motors for some typical drive cycles. The gear ratio of the drive train was optimized for each motor with respect to the drive cycle and the vehicle performances were calculated. The methodology and results presented provide a novel and improved framework for considering the trade-offs between the motor size, gear ratio and vehicle performance for Class IV and other vehicle classes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207