MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W250285803

Reflections on a Half-Century of Mennonite Change

2003· review· en· W250285803 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John W. Meyer

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œMennonite quarterly review · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Farm Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)ChristianityFaithOptimal distinctiveness theorySociologyHistoryEnvironmental ethicsEpistemologyPhilosophySocial psychologyPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a person of (Old) background now functioning in a secular context, I will comment on the world I come from and how it has changed over the decades. I will also note the impact of themes on my work as a sociologist and reflect on my own departure from the tradition. Naturally, assessing change over a half-century is difficult. We lack--and I certainly lack--detailed knowledge of the diverse and often opaque societies of the 1950s. To a lesser extent, we lack scholarly descriptions of the still-diverse present, too. Because I do not command the literature that does exist, my account is unfortunately somewhat limited. One can look at the unusually successful survival of the distinctive label Mennonite over some centuries from several points of view. An internal perspective, seeing this survival as a product of factors within the tradition itself, calls attention to themes of special religious faith and their roots in some core aspects of Christianity that are left out in most versions of the Christian religion. The internal perspective also notes some special features of social history and organization that facilitated survival, most obviously communal disciplinary arrangements that enforced separation from society without employing organizational structures competing too directly with the powerful secular ones of the national state. An external perspective, which I will emphasize here, notes some features of the wider environment that created and sustained a niche for both Mennonites and their distinctiveness. For example, a background factor permitting the expansions of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries is the rapid long-term expansion of the world agricultural (especially grain) market, providing economic opportunities for rational and communitarian producers in formerly very distant and unorganized areas (e.g., Ukraine, western Canada). But the most important factor in survival is obviously the rise to complete world dominance of the institution of the nation-state. This structure, combining a monopoly over secular power with spiritual (religious and nationalist) claims, rose in its modern form in the sixteenth century and expanded greatly in the centuries since. It now covers the globe and claims penetrative authority over and responsibility for the details of social life (family relationships, education, medicine, economic organization and so on). It has a murderous history of internal and external violence, in part because it combines great secular power with psychological and transcendental motives and legitimations. (1) The rise of the nation-state in world society, over several centuries, killed off many competitors. Externally, empires collapsed and both the universality and the secular power of the medieval church were undercut. Internal to national societies, decentralized and parcelized feudal sovereignties were destroyed by the expanding authority and power of the state, as were many large-scale tribal and familial powers. But these changes, which eliminated most for power, created or strengthened some new niches for social mobilization at the margins or peripheries of society. Supranationally, the weakening of the medieval church produced many movements celebrating the universality and commonality of the human spirit. Intranationally, the weakening of feudal and tribal authority produced the enormous modern expansion in the authority of the individual person as citizen (and now human). The Anabaptists and Mennonites--especially as they gave up initially more aggressive postures and learned to disavow entirely claims to secular power and authority--found a niche in this system. In doing so, they paralleled other movements in the peripheries of world society that celebrated, as far rather than near competitors to the state, both much larger and much smaller solidarities than the nation. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.912

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œMennonite quarterly reviewSame topicAgriculture and Farm SafetyFrench-language works237,207