MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2502958608 · doi:10.29092/uacm.v12i28.40

La teoría de las configuraciones sociales de Norbert Elias y su aplicación a la sociología del deporte recreativo en las nuevas élites de prestigio

2015· article· es· W2502958608 on OpenAlexaff
Francisco Toledo Ortiz

Bibliographic record

VenueAndamios · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSociology and Norbert Elias
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente artículo muestra cómo las nociones de proceso civilizatorio y de configuración contenidas en la teoría de Norbert Elias pueden utilizarse para analizar el surgimiento de las jóvenes élites simbólicas del capitalismo avanzado. Asimismo, nuestro interés por la noción eliasiana de curialización deportiva nos condujo a abordar teórica y epistemológicamente la construcción del prestigio social de la llamada “clase creativa”. Esta perspectiva también nos permitió estudiar la riqueza conceptual de las relaciones del doble vínculo establecidos-marginales, el cual liga entre sí a los jóvenes profesionistas hipermodernos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.431
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAndamiosSame topicSociology and Norbert EliasFrench-language works237,207