Indicadores macroeconômicos de fi nanceirização: metodologia de construção e aplicação ao caso do Brasil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ResumoO regime de crescimento econômico brasileiro tem sido adversamente condicionado pelos interesses da revalorização rentista dos capitais e, mais amplamente, pela lógica e natureza da acumulação financeira, atualmente potencializada em mercados globais.Não é surpreendente que um dos fatos estilizados dos últimos 20 anos no Brasil seja a permanência de taxas muito baixas e voláteis de crescimento do PIB, comparativamente aos demais países emergentes.Com base na definição e no estatuto teórico do conceito de financeirização, o presente artigo constrói indicadores para a avaliação desse fenômeno no âmbito macroeconômico.Entre outras características, a financeirização na economia brasileira destaca-se pela proeminência da renda de juros, constituindose em um padrão diverso do observado em economias avançadas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".