MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2503091798 · doi:10.1177/2043820616653286

My Aunt Sally, or, ‘our’ Keynes and the varieties of Keynesianism

2016· article· en· W2503091798 on OpenAlexaff
Geoff Mann

Bibliographic record

VenueDialogues in Human Geography · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Economy and Marxism
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHegelianismContext (archaeology)PoliticsRelation (database)Keynesian economicsNeoclassical economicsPost-Keynesian economicsDemocracyPositive economicsEconomicsSociologyEpistemologyPhilosophyLawPolitical scienceHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unable to properly address the full range of insight provided in the responses to ‘Keynes resurrected?’ in this reply I try to explain my motivations for the paper and situate its (several) problems in that larger context. I also speak specifically to the questions of Keynesianism’s relation to neo-liberalism, to ‘deep democracy’, and to the limited political horizons suggested by the territorial imaginary that arguably underwrites the original article. I also try to better justify my claim that ‘Keynes is our Hegel’, by linking Keynesian reason to a broader intellectual and historical trajectory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score0.818

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDialogues in Human GeographySame topicPolitical Economy and MarxismFrench-language works237,207