MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2503121023 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316152638.007

Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada <i>v</i>. Edelson and Others

2007· article· en· W2503121023 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Law Reports · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInternational Arbitration and Investment Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawState immunityMajestyState (computer science)Political scienceCustomary international lawInternational lawLeaseSovereign immunityCommon lawPublic international lawConstitution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

279 State immunity — Jurisdictional immunity — Whether rules forming part of customary international law — Whether restricted or absolute — Distinction between acts performed jure imperii and jure gestionis — Nature and purpose tests — Test of whether a private entity other than the State could have been a party to the act — Freedom of States to adopt different rules pending the development of a standardized international practice — Purchase or rental of buildings for ambassadorial residence not covered by State immunity — Head of State — Action against Head of State in substance an action against the State itself Diplomatic relations — Diplomatic immunity — Ambassador — Whether acting as State’s representative in conclusion of lease or as party to legal proceedings — Party to lease being sovereign State of Canada — Dispute covered by State immunity rather than diplomatic immunity Relationship of international law and municipal law — Customary international law — Part of the law of the State of Israel — Conflict between rules of customary international law and Israeli legislation — Whether the latter prevails — The law of Israel

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0640.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Law ReportsSame topicInternational Arbitration and Investment LawFrench-language works237,207