MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2503176705 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v8n4p195

On Dynamical Systems for Transport Logistic and Communications

2016· article· en· W2503176705 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alexander P. Buslaev, A. G. Tatashev

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsIrrational numberUnit squareCompetition (biology)Probabilistic logicCombinatoricsBase (topology)Path (computing)Algebraic numberPlan (archaeology)Discrete mathematicsGeometryComputer scienceMathematical analysisStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper a discrete dynamical system is considered . There is a dial with $N$ positions (vertices) and $M$ particles. Particles are located in vertices. Each particle moves, at every time unit, in accordance with its plan. The plan is logistics, given through a real number which belongs to the segment $[0,1].$ The number is represented in positional numeral system with base $N$ equal to the number of vertices. A competition takes place if particles must move in opposite directions simultaneously. A rule of competition resolution is given. Systems characteristics are investigated for sets of rational and irrational plans. Some algebraic constructions are introduced for this purpose. Probabilistic analogues (random walks) are also considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.256
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematics ResearchSame topicComputability, Logic, AI AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207