Suspected anaphylaxis from intravenous cefazolin during general anaesthesia in a dog
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A six‐year‐old female Shetland Sheepdog with a history of cardiorespiratory compromise during general anaesthesia was referred for ovariohysterectomy surgery. Clinical examination was unremarkable at presentation and physiological parameters under general anaesthesia were within expected ranges during preparation for surgery. Shortly after injecting intravenous cefazolin, the audible signal from the Doppler ultrasound unit stopped. Rapid survey of the patient revealed tachycardia with weak femoral pulses, tachypnoea, hyperpnoea and substantially increased resistance to manual positive pressure ventilation. Stopping inhalant anaesthesia, administering salbutamol, corticosteroids and diphenhydramine were associated with resolution of clinical signs. However, marked hypotension and resistance to ventilation recurred approximately 25 minutes later. Low dose intravenous adrenaline (5 mcg/kg) was effective at increasing arterial blood pressure and reversing respiratory dysfunction. Surgery was completed and the patient recovered uneventfully. Initial reliance on second‐line therapy and delay in administering adrenaline, the recommended treatment for anaphylaxis, may have slowed resolution of clinical signs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it