MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2503979078 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.37876

Maternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 6 in a patient with IUGR, ambiguous genitalia, and persistent mullerian structures

2016· review· en· W2503979078 on OpenAlexaff
Joanna Lazier, Nicole Martin, James Stavropoulos, David Chitayat

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoUniversity of AlbertaSickKids FoundationMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUniparental disomyKaryotypeBiologySNP arrayTestis determining factorAmbiguous genitaliaVaginaChromosomeGeneticsGynecologyY chromosomeMedicineAnatomySingle-nucleotide polymorphismGeneGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 6 [upd(6)mat] is rare and has only been previously reported 13 times with the main associated phenotype being IUGR. We present a case of a male patient with isodisomy upd(6)mat resulting in severe IUGR and ambiguous genitalia, a phenotype not previously described in association with this chromosome finding. The patient initially presented prenatally with IUGR at 19 weeks gestation with placental dysfunction and ambiguous genitalia noted at 27 weeks. Postnatally, the patient had external genital abnormalities, the gonads were in the inguinal canal and there was a rudimentary appearing vagina and uterus. Karyotype is 46, XY and SNP array revealed maternal isodisomy of 171 Mb at 6p25.3q27 with no pathogenic copy number variants. To our best knowledge, this is the first case of an XY patient with upd(6)mat with IUGR and ambiguous genitalia, further supporting previous reports regarding an association between upd(6)mat and IUGR. This patient also presented with a disorder of sex development (46, XY DSD) with the sex chromosome being male and positive for the SRY gene, testicular gonadal sex and abnormal external and internal genitalia. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part ASame topicGenetic Syndromes and ImprintingFrench-language works237,207