MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2503986965 · doi:10.1057/9780230244863_3

Consumption and Leisure in Context

2009· book-chapter· en· W2503986965 on OpenAlexaff
Robert A. Stebbins

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSport and Mega-Event Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnic groupTasteConsumption (sociology)Product (mathematics)Promotion (chess)Context (archaeology)Stereotype (UML)NationalitySociologyPublic relationsAdvertisingPolitical scienceSocial psychologyPsychologySocial scienceBusinessGeographyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter looks further into the personal and social conditions in which the consumptive leisure experience of today takes place. The personal conditions include health, wealth, marital status, level of education, taste and talent for a given product and accompanying activity, knowledge of the product and the activity, and the like. Numbering among the social conditions are advertising and promotion, historical forces, type of government, local and national culture, gender stereotype, ethnicity (including religion, race, nationality), consumer advocacy groups and services, geographic location, and others. Still, the scholarly literature in this area is not nearly as broad ranging as these lists. In fact, only a small, though perceptive and sometimes controversial, set of thinkers have addressed themselves to a select set of personal and social conditions that they considered crucial to understanding consumption as they observed it at the time they wrote. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.010
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks→Same topicSport and Mega-Event Impacts→French-language works237,207→