MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2504092508 · doi:10.1177/000842980903800202

Tantra as a religious category in the Mahābhāgavata Purāna

2009· article· en· W2504092508 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicIndian and Buddhist Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTantraNarrativeScholarshipPilgrimageLiteratureHistoryArtAncient historyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Mahā bhā gavata Purāna is a late medieval Śākta text with significant links to Kāmarūpa, the pilgrimage site near Gauhati, Assam. This text's inclusive religious vision emphasizes bhakti and explicitly acknowledges Tantra as a legitimate religious category. Implicitly, the Mahā bhāgavata integrates Tantra and bhakti through narratives that depict Tantric practices and principles while demonstrating their compatibility and even their unity with bhakti. This paper examines the treatment of Tantra in the Mahā bh ā gavata and argues that the text gives voice to a variety of concerns about Tantra at Kāmarūpa in the late medieval period. Further, this text, which has so far received little attention in modern scholarship, challenges definitions of Tantra as primarily or essentially transgressive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it