Les représentations de la pratique interdisciplinaire chez les enseignants québécois du primaire
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article takes into account a typology of representations held by Quebec primary teachers with regard to interdisciplinary practices, by relying on the results of research work conducted during the course of the past ten years. Four main trends constitute the poles of the two continuums that cross each other. They characterize the representations of school interdisciplinarity practices which are not, or which are often far from being in agreement with a conception of interdisciplinarity that would assure mutual dependence, with no predominance and with no ignorance whatsoever between domains of study, and that would allow for the establishment of complementarities and effective interrelations. racterize the representations of school interdisciplinarity practices which are not, or which are often far from being in agreement with a conception of interdisciplinarity that would assure mutual dependence, with no predominance and with no ignorance whatsoever between domains of study, and that would allow for the establishment of complementarities and effective interrelations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it