MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2504135367 · doi:10.1161/str.47.suppl_1.tp161

Abstract TP161: Gastrointestinal Bowel Obstruction in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes

2016· article· en· W2504135367 on OpenAlexaff
Kavelin Rumalla, Adithi Y. Reddy, Vijay Letchuman, Paul A Berger, Manoj Mittal

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEsophageal and GI Pathology
Canadian institutionsBerger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineIncidence (geometry)Stroke (engine)AnemiaLogistic regressionSurgeryGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The prognosis of patients suffering acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is worsened by medical complications that occur during subsequent hospitalization. The incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of gastrointestinal bowel obstruction (GIBO) in AIS have not been previously reported. Methods: We employed the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2002 to 2011 to identify all patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of AIS and subsets with and without a secondary diagnosis of GIBO without hernia. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to analyze predictors of GIBO in AIS patients and the association between GIBO, in-hospital complications, and outcomes. Results: We identified 16,987 patients with GIBO (425 per 100,000) among 3,988,667 AIS hospitalizations and 4.2% of patients of these patients underwent repair surgery for intestinal obstruction. Multivariate predictors of GIBO included: age 55-64 (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.40-1.64), age 65-74 (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.56-1.84), age 75+ (OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.81-2.13), black race (OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.36-1.49), coagulopathy (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.29-1.50), cancer (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.44-1.75), blood loss anemia (OR: 2.51, 95% CI: 2.22-2.84), fluid/electrolyte disorder (OR: 2.91, 95% CI: 2.81-3.02), weight loss (OR: 3.08, 95% CI: 2.93-3.25), and thrombolytic therapy (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.20-1.42) (all p<0.0001). Patients with GIBO had a greater likelihood of suffering intubation (OR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.70-1.90), deep vein thrombosis (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.25-1.46), pulmonary embolism (OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.53-2.21), sepsis (OR: 2.39, 95% CI: 2.22-2.56), acute kidney injury (OR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.76-1.95), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (OR: 2.82, 95% CI: 2.63-3.03), and blood transfusions (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.90-2.15) (all p<0.0001). In adjusted analyses, AIS patients with GIBO were 284% and 39% more likely to face moderate to severe disability and in-hospital death, respectively (p<0.0001). GIBO occurrence increased length of stay and total costs by an average of 9.7 days and $22,342 (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Advanced age, black race, and several pre-existing comorbidities increase the likelihood of post-AIS GIBO, which is an independent predictor of in-hospital complications, disability, and mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicEsophageal and GI PathologyFrench-language works237,207