2013: Breadth of Global Slowdown Disconcerting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter discusses how the global economy performed in 2013, with the first quarter of 2013 gross domestic product (GDP) growth in the US and China having turned disappointing. Unemployment in Europe remained un-relentlessly brutal, reflecting the deepening recession. In April, an important index of global economic activity fell to its lowest level since October 2012, suggesting that the world economy is barely managing to accelerate. The Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) had expressed disappointment that the global economy is moving too slowly, although at multiple speeds, in its recent semiannual Economic Outlook. The International Monetary Fund's (IMF) lowered forecast shaved a quarter of 1 percentage point off its April 2013 projection of 8 percent for China to 7.75 percent, still higher than the government's target of 7.5 percent. China grew at its slowest pace for 13 years in 2012. Latest May data point to unconvincing growth, with momentum losing pace toward a slower second quarter of 2013. It would seem the new leadership could even tolerate growth slipping to 7 percent, provided the economy and employment remain stable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".