MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2504267986 · doi:10.1109/pes.2003.1267452

Identification of physical parameters of a synchronous generator from on-line measurements

2004· article· en· W2504267986 on OpenAlexaff
M. Karrari, O.P. Malik

Bibliographic record

Venue2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37491) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemPermanent magnet synchronous generatorVoltageMultivariable calculusGenerator (circuit theory)Transfer functionSynchronous motorComputer scienceElectric generatorEngineeringPower (physics)Control engineeringPhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. A new method to determine physical parameters of a synchronous generator based on an online measurement of the electrical power, terminal voltage and field voltage, following a small perturbation of the field voltage, and the rotor angle at the same steady state operating condition is described in this paper. A multivariable linear transfer function, identified using the sampled input-output data, is converted to the parameters of the Heffron-Phillips model. Using the relations of the Heffron-Phillips parameters with the physical parameters, the physical parameters are estimated. These estimated parameters are then used in a nonlinear structure to model the synchronous generator. Experimental results with the proposed method applied to a micro-machine show good accuracy of the model and also show that the identified nonlinear model is valid at other operating conditions. At dramatically different operating conditions, however, to include the effects of unstructured nonlinearities such as magnetic saturation, the parameters of the nonlinear structure can be slightly adjusted for a better performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37491)Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207