MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Assessing Joint Stability from Eigenvalues Obtained from Multi-Channel EMG

2014· book-chapter· en· W2504723115 on OpenAlexaff
D.M. Ikeda, Stuart M. McGill

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in medical technologies and clinical practice book series · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsStability (learning theory)Physical medicine and rehabilitationCore stabilityJoint (building)Muscle stiffnessLumbar spineJoint stabilityJoint stiffnessStiffnessComputer sciencePhysical therapyMedicineEngineeringStructural engineeringMachine learningPhysicsAlternative medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electromyographic (EMG) signals have many uses. This chapter addresses the role of EMG signals to assess joint stability. Low back pain assessment and treatment interventions often involve the concepts of stability and/or joint stiffness. Using muscle activation and lumbar spine posture to calculate segmental stiffness and potential energy of the spine, eigenvalues can be linked to quantitative stability. It is reasoned that if a relationship exists between eigenvalues and individual muscles, then this approach can guide customized clinical intervention for people with defined spine instability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in medical technologies and clinical practice book seriesSame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207