Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study has attempted to illustrate how, in the pages of British Gothic literature, ‘the English turned to Jewish questions to answer English ones’ (Shapiro, Shakespeare: 1). To this end, it has traced the transformation of the largely benevolent Wandering Jew of legend into a dreaded-yet-desired and ultimately ethnically unidentified vampire figure in various British Gothic works published over the course of a century. It has delineated how anti-Semitic stereotypes involving the Blood Libel, secret societies, and the Cabala were progressively grafted onto that legendary figure in various reformulations of the Jewish Question in order to engage with shifting debates about British national identity. That these spectropoetics, as I have termed them, became manifest in the British Gothic novel, a literary form which emerged at the end of the eighteenth century, was significant: this genre betrayed conscious and unconscious desires and anxieties about national issues (Punter, Literature: 62) during ‘one of the most formative periods in the making of the modern world and … the forging of British identity’ (Colley, Britons: 7).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".