MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2505026719 · doi:10.1057/9781137298997_5

Gothic Weddings and Performing Vampires: Geneviève Ward and The Lady of the Shroud

2013· book-chapter· en· W2505026719 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Catherine Wynne

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCeremonyAdventureQuarter (Canadian coin)LawGirlArtHistoryArt historyPolitical sciencePsychologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Personal Reminiscences, Stoker relates the marital adventure of the American actress-manager Geneviève Ward. ‘Whilst a very young girl’, Ward had married the Comte de Guerbel in a civil ceremony in Nice in 1855 (1906, vol. 2: 170). Her husband argued that, according to Russian law, the union was not legal until another ceremony was performed in a Russian Orthodox church. After the Nice nuptials, de Guerbel had promised to solemnize the union in the Russian church in Paris. However, the Comte was not, notes Stoker, ‘of chivalrous nature’ and ‘in time his fancy veered round to some other quarter, and he declared by a trick of Russian law which does not acknowledge the marriage of a Russian until the ceremony in the Russian church has been performed, the marriage which had taken place was not legal’ (1906, vol. 2: 170–1). After waiting several months and on the discovery that de Guerbel was making marriage preparations with a Russian heiress, the well-connected Wards decided to take action.1 The rejected bride and her mother subsequently travelled to St Petersburg to petition the Tsar who, at Ward’s request, commanded de Guerbel to solemnize the marriage in Warsaw.2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0190.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooksSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207