MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W250503452

Dynamics of Fluid Particles in Turbulent Flows; CFD simulations, Model Development and Phenomenological Studies

2005· article· en· W250503452 on OpenAlex
Ronnie Andersson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueChalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Mixing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreakupTurbulenceMechanicsComputational fluid dynamicsFluid dynamicsEddyBreak-UpPopulationPhenomenological modelTwo-fluid modelStatistical physicsPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thesis investigates the dynamics of fluid particles in turbulent flows, which plays an important role in the chemical, pharmaceutical, food and petroleum industries. Phenomenological studies, new mathematical models for the breakup phenomena, and development of a simulation method for chemical reactors constitute the main parts of this thesis. \nThe simulation method, based on CFD population balance modeling, was successfully used in the development process of a new reactor designed by Alfa Laval. Validation with experimental measurements, for a wide range of hydrodynamic conditions and fluid properties relevant to technical applications, showed that predictions with high accuracy can be obtained. \nDetailed studies on the breakup mechanisms of fluid particles were made with a high-speed imaging technique devised for this work. It was shown that although the initial stage of the breakup process is similar for bubbles and drops, the outcomes differ significantly. An internal flow mechanism was identified as responsible for the difference in the resulting daughter size distributions. While bubbles generate unequal-sized fragments, drops often form equal-sized fragments. The number of fragments formed by breakup is also different for bubbles and drops. \nA new model for the breakup rate of fluid particles was developed in this work. In the model two criteria must be fulfilled for breakup to occur. A new model for the interaction frequency between fluid particles and turbulent eddies was also developed. Validation with experimental measurements of the breakup rate showed that the new model gives excellent predictions. Furthermore, the model reveals that eddies close in size to, and up to three times larger than, the fluid particles contribute to the breakup. This prediction agrees with the studies of the breakup mechanisms, which show that fluid particles often deform significantly before breakup occurs. \n\n\n\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score0.662

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it