Brain morphometry in Pontocerebellar Hypoplasia type 2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 2 (PCH2) is caused by a defect in the TSEN54-gene and leads to severe and early disruption of brain development, especially of cerebellum and pons. The aim of this work was to quantify the infra- and supratentorial brain growth during postnatal brain development in children with PCH2. METHODS: MRI data of 24 children with PCH2 (age 0.02-17 years., 13 females) were analysed volumetrically and compared to images of 24 typically developing age- and gender-matched children. All children with PCH2 had the homozygous p.A307S mutation in the TSEN54-gene. In 5 patients follow-up MRI investigations were available. Images of the children with PCH2 were available either on film (n = 12) or in digital format (n = 21). Images on film were digitalized. Brain structures were manually masked and further adjusted semi-automatically using intensity thresholding to exclude CSF. Volumes of cerebellum, brain stem, and pons were measured, as well as supratentorial brain and frontal lobe volume. For validation of the method part of the digital images were processed as images on film. In addition, intra- and inter-rater variabilities were tested. RESULTS: Children with PCH2 showed reduced volumes of all measured brain structures compared to healthy controls. Severely hypoplastic cerebellum, pons and brain stem only slightly increased in size postnatally. Supratentorial brain volume also showed reduced growth compared to the healthy controls. Differences between patients and controls could already be seen at birth but became more significant during childhood. Validation of the method showed high precision and reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: In a genetically very homogenous group of children with PCH2 severely hypoplastic infratentorial structures, the hallmark of the disease, showed only slight increase in volume postnatally. Supratentorial brain structures, which are considered normal at birth, also showed smaller volumes neonatally and a lower growth rate compared to controls, leading to severe microcephaly. Volume loss, however, could not be observed during the first years of life. This argues for a severe disruption of the cerebellar-cerebral networks during pre- and postnatal development caused by a primary cerebellar dysfunction, rather than postnatal neurodegeneration. The developmental progress in these children, although little, further supports this.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".