MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W250538848

Anglicanorum Ceotibus and the Church of Our Lady of the Atonement, the Founding Parish of Anglican Use in the Roman Catholic Church

2011· article· en· W250538848 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Duane Alexander Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueAnglican and Episcopal history · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBishopsLiturgyFaithEucharistHistoryBaptismTheologyArchbishopChristianityReligious studiesDoctrineLawSociologyClassicsPolitical sciencePhilosophyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anglicanorum Ceotibus and the Church of Our Lady of the Atonement, the Founding Parish of Anglican Use in the Roman Catholic Feast of St. David of Wales, 1 March 2011 Anglicanism is sometimes called Catholic-lite because of its retention of a formalized liturgy and bishops, elements that churches born during the sixteenui-century European reformations often did not perpetuate. Among Anglicans, there have always been some longed for the Church of England to re-establish full communion with the Roman Catholic but many factors make this appear to be an impossibility today. Nonetheless, having been approached by Anglicans over me decades, the Roman Catholic Church has gradually opened new avenues for Anglican and Episcopal priests, and then for entire groups of Anglicans, to enter into full communion with Rome, while also retaining elements of their heritage and tradition. The Pastoral Provision of John Paul II On 22 July 1980, Franjo Cardinal Seper, prefect of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith (CDF), notified John Quinn, thenarchbishop of San Francisco, mat the CDF had decided, regarding certain Episcopalians who seek reconciliation with and entrance into the Catholic Church, that should be made so mat such groups will be able to continue to maintain a identity. Furthermore, the re-ordination of Episcopal clergy, even those are married, shall be allowed. ... Put into practice only in die United States, such a pastoral provision resulted only from a specific request from a college of bishops - and the colleges of bishops in England and Wales, Canada, Australia, and elsewhere had not issued such a request. An important aspect of the continuation of a common identity was the creation of an Anglican Use within the Roman Catholic Church in the United States. The precise word use is important, as the provision allowed for priests and individuals to enter the Roman Catholic Church and did not establish a different rite. The Greek Catholic Church and the Maronite Catholic for example, are independent churches that are in communion with the Roman Catholic but they have their own canon laws, bishops, and liturgies. The Anglican Use is not such an entity, but rather is part of the Roman Catholic Church itself. Seeking to preserve an Episcopal liturgical tradition, but within the context of the Roman Catholic Church in the United States, a committee compiled a collection of rituals and rubrics analogous to the Book of Common Prayer. Therefore, in 1984, the CDF allowed for the interim use of the Book of Divine Worship1, and then in 1987 gave it final approval. This document allowed elements of the older Prayer Book of 1928, but die Eucharistie liturgy was taken only from the 1979 Book of Common Prayer with the interpolation of the Roman Eucharistie Canons and the ancient Sarum Canon (with the modern English 'Words of Institution' from the Novus ordo missae inserted).2 The Book of Divine Worship is clearly modeled after the Book of Common Prayer, containing many of die same elements, including orders for morning, noonday, and evening prayers, as well as compline. The calendar contains the names of various American saints like Katharine Drexel and John Neumann, which reminds us that the Book of Divine Worship, Ln its first edition, was published specifically for use in the United States of America. The Feast Day of St. Augustine of Canterbury is a mandatory feast, and not an optional one. Anglo-CaUiolic figures like Lancelot Andrewes and John Keble are absent. The cycle of readings is for two years. There are two rites for the Eucharist. In addition to the Eucharistie rite, the liturgies for Holy Baptism, Holy Matrimony, and the Burial of the Dead follow. As with die Eucharist, there are two rites for each of tiiose. The two rites are very close to each other, die difference being that the first rite uses English contemporaneous with me King James Bible, and the second rite uses contemporary English. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnglican and Episcopal historySame topicTheology and Canon Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207