Anglicanorum Ceotibus and the Church of Our Lady of the Atonement, the Founding Parish of Anglican Use in the Roman Catholic Church
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anglicanorum Ceotibus and the Church of Our Lady of the Atonement, the Founding Parish of Anglican Use in the Roman Catholic Feast of St. David of Wales, 1 March 2011 Anglicanism is sometimes called Catholic-lite because of its retention of a formalized liturgy and bishops, elements that churches born during the sixteenui-century European reformations often did not perpetuate. Among Anglicans, there have always been some longed for the Church of England to re-establish full communion with the Roman Catholic but many factors make this appear to be an impossibility today. Nonetheless, having been approached by Anglicans over me decades, the Roman Catholic Church has gradually opened new avenues for Anglican and Episcopal priests, and then for entire groups of Anglicans, to enter into full communion with Rome, while also retaining elements of their heritage and tradition. The Pastoral Provision of John Paul II On 22 July 1980, Franjo Cardinal Seper, prefect of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith (CDF), notified John Quinn, thenarchbishop of San Francisco, mat the CDF had decided, regarding certain Episcopalians who seek reconciliation with and entrance into the Catholic Church, that should be made so mat such groups will be able to continue to maintain a identity. Furthermore, the re-ordination of Episcopal clergy, even those are married, shall be allowed. ... Put into practice only in die United States, such a pastoral provision resulted only from a specific request from a college of bishops - and the colleges of bishops in England and Wales, Canada, Australia, and elsewhere had not issued such a request. An important aspect of the continuation of a common identity was the creation of an Anglican Use within the Roman Catholic Church in the United States. The precise word use is important, as the provision allowed for priests and individuals to enter the Roman Catholic Church and did not establish a different rite. The Greek Catholic Church and the Maronite Catholic for example, are independent churches that are in communion with the Roman Catholic but they have their own canon laws, bishops, and liturgies. The Anglican Use is not such an entity, but rather is part of the Roman Catholic Church itself. Seeking to preserve an Episcopal liturgical tradition, but within the context of the Roman Catholic Church in the United States, a committee compiled a collection of rituals and rubrics analogous to the Book of Common Prayer. Therefore, in 1984, the CDF allowed for the interim use of the Book of Divine Worship1, and then in 1987 gave it final approval. This document allowed elements of the older Prayer Book of 1928, but die Eucharistie liturgy was taken only from the 1979 Book of Common Prayer with the interpolation of the Roman Eucharistie Canons and the ancient Sarum Canon (with the modern English 'Words of Institution' from the Novus ordo missae inserted).2 The Book of Divine Worship is clearly modeled after the Book of Common Prayer, containing many of die same elements, including orders for morning, noonday, and evening prayers, as well as compline. The calendar contains the names of various American saints like Katharine Drexel and John Neumann, which reminds us that the Book of Divine Worship, Ln its first edition, was published specifically for use in the United States of America. The Feast Day of St. Augustine of Canterbury is a mandatory feast, and not an optional one. Anglo-CaUiolic figures like Lancelot Andrewes and John Keble are absent. The cycle of readings is for two years. There are two rites for the Eucharist. In addition to the Eucharistie rite, the liturgies for Holy Baptism, Holy Matrimony, and the Burial of the Dead follow. As with die Eucharist, there are two rites for each of tiiose. The two rites are very close to each other, die difference being that the first rite uses English contemporaneous with me King James Bible, and the second rite uses contemporary English. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it