Vieillesse ou vieillissement ? Les processus d’organisation des modes de vie chez les personnes âgées
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comme n’importe quel acteur social, les personnes âgées mettent en oeuvre diverses sortes de tactiques (on ne préjuge pas que leurs pratiques sont le fruit d’une élaboration consciente ou l’adaptation de routines) pour affronter les difficultés de la vie quotidienne. La diversité et la dispersion de ces pratiques s’expliquent en partie par la nature des problèmes auxquels elles sont confrontées aux différents moments de leur trajectoire. Trois sortes de problèmes importants structurent ces itinéraires : le changement provoqué par la fin de l’activité professionnelle ou familiale; la restriction des activités imposée par les déficiences ou handicaps; la dépendance physique ou morale. Autour des stratégies d’affrontement de ces problèmes, on peut élaborer un modèle simplifié des processus de vieillissement, à trois épisodes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".