MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2505514615 · doi:10.1109/icc.2016.7510919

Weighted network traffic offloading in cache-enabled heterogeneous networks

2016· article· en· W2505514615 on OpenAlexaff
Xiuhua Li, Xiaofei Wang, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCacheComputer networkHeterogeneous networkCellular networkHeuristicThroughputInteger programmingLinear programmingDistributed computingWireless networkWirelessAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to explosive demands of multimedia services from mobile users, the growing network traffic load becomes a severe challenge for mobile network operators (MNOs). To address this problem, content caching is regarded as an effective emerging technique to reduce the duplicated transmissions of the content downloads demanded by mobile users, while heterogeneous networks (HetNets) are regarded as an effective technique to increase the network throughput. Thus, this paper focuses on content caching in HetNets to offload the weighted network traffic, in which we consider the problem of minimizing the weighted expected sum of traffic load of accessing the requested contents. By transforming the irregular problem into a binary integer linear programming problem, we propose a novel suboptimal heuristic algorithm with polynomial-time complexity to solve the problem, instead of using the existing optimal branch-and-bound method with exponential-time complexity. Numerical results demonstrate that our proposed content caching framework can reduce the weighted expected sum of traffic load significantly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207