MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2505614348 · doi:10.1504/ijgw.2016.077911

Modelling residential house electricity demand profile and analysis of peaksaver program using ANN: case study for Toronto, Canada

2016· article· en· W2505614348 on OpenAlex
M. Ebrahim Poulad, Alan S. Fung, Lei He, C. Özgür Çolpan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Global Warming · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectricityElectricity demandEnvironmental scienceEnergy demandPeak loadPeak demandDemand responseElectricity generationAgricultural economicsEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental economicsEngineeringEconomicsAutomotive engineeringPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A technique is proposed and developed to predict the household hourly electricity demand. The developed artificial neural network (ANN) model of residential hourly demand is employed to estimate the potential impacts of load curtailment activation (LCA) on electricity demand on the activation days. Results are separately discussed in two seasons: summer and winter. LCA occurs once per day for no more than four consecutive hours. Electricity demand increases dramatically after peaksaver/LCA is completed on July 6 and August 30 of 2010. Both days show saving if the data are not normalised. Unnormalised load reductions for individual event hours ranged between 0.35 and 0.64 kWh/h or 14% and 24%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.879

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it