MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2505735898 · doi:10.33137/rr.v39i2.8867

Montaigne and the Sports of Italy

2003· article· fr· W2505735898 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
John McClelland

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDoping in Sports
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

De son propre aveu (Essais II, 17) Montaigne n’était pas très sportif. Pourtant, dès la première édition des Essais il y inséra de nombreuses allusions aux sports et de fréquentes métaphores tirées de pratiques athlétiques.De même, pendant son voyage en Allemagne, Suisse et Italie il assista — à une exception près — à toutes les manifestations sportives qui se présentèrent, préférant toutefois celles qui impliquaient la noblesse ou qui lui rappelaient la Rome ancienne. En France à l’époque il y avait très peu de possibilités de regarder des concours athlétiques, et encore moins de parler sport avec des gens de sa classe sociale et intellectuelle. En Italie, il a pu faire les deux, et se réjouissait d’être invité parmi des nobles florentins à discourir un après-midi sur l’escrime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicDoping in SportsFrench-language works237,207