MPPT and control design of a Vienna rectifier-based low power wind turbine with reduced number of sensors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low power wind turbines (LPWT) are an interesting option for distributed generation. Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) procedures for LPWT are either based on look-up tables or use an algorithm. This paper proposes an MPPT algorithm for wind energy analogous to that of the incremental inductance for solar energy. The Vienna rectifier is an efficient non-regenerative power converter with only three switching devices and its use for LPWT can be advantageous. The permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) is a common option for LPWT because of its efficiency. This manuscript explains the sensorless vector control of PMSG using the Vienna rectifier, which results to be analogous to that of the traditional full bridge converter for unity power factor. In addition, the unbalanced voltage in the Vienna rectifier capacitors is derived from the modulation indexes without requiring an additional sensor. Hence, the resulting LPWT has low losses by virtue of the Vienna rectifier, and lower cost and higher reliability by virtue of the sensorless vector control and unbalance voltage estimation. Simulation results validate the proposals of the paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".