MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2506162060 · doi:10.1021/bk-2000-0752.ch030

The Role of Plasma Lipoproteins as Carriers of Water-Insoluble Compounds: Biological and Physiological Consequences

2000· book-chapter· en· W2506162060 on OpenAlexaff
Kishor M. Wasan, Manisha Ramaswamy, Allison L. Kennedy, Kathy D. Peteherych, Wesley Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueACS symposium series · 2000
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasma lipoproteinLipoproteinDrugPharmacologyChemistryPharmacokineticsDistribution (mathematics)Human plasmaCholesterolBiochemistryBiologyChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The plasma lipoprotein distribution of potential drug candidates to date has not commonly been investigated. For some hydrophobic drug candidates, attainment of similar plasma free drug levels has not been associated with uniform production of pharmacological activity in different animal species. It is well-known that plasma lipoprotein lipid profiles vary considerably between different animal species. In addition, human disease states can significantly influence plasma lipoprotein profiles, resulting in altered therapeutic outcomes. Current research has shown that lipoprotein association of drug compounds can significantly influence their pharmacological and pharmacokinetic properties. The focus of this paper will be to review the factors that influence the interaction of one model hydrophobic compound, cyclosporine (CsA), and compounds incorporated into lipid-based vesicles with lipoproteins and the implications of altered plasma lipoprotein concentrations on the pharmacological behavior of these compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS symposium seriesSame topicCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismFrench-language works237,207