MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2506356935 · doi:10.2118/2008-143

Study of Diffusivity of Hydrocarbon Solvent in Heavy Oil Saturated Sands Using X-Ray Computer Assisted Tomography

2008· article· en· W2506356935 on OpenAlexafffund
Hao Luo, Apostolos Kantzas

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanada Research ChairsPorous Media Laboratory
KeywordsThermal diffusivityPorosityHydrocarbonSolventMass diffusivityPorous mediumDiffusionOil sandsMixing (physics)Volume (thermodynamics)Saturation (graph theory)Materials scienceMineralogyPetroleum engineeringAsphaltGeologyChemistryThermodynamicsComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hydrocarbon solvent-assisted processes are thought to beeffective EOR technologies for heavy oil and bitumen production. In order to describe those processes quantitatively, the diffusivity of hydrocarbon solvent in oil sands is a crucial required parameter. Computer Assisted Tomography (CAT), as a non-intrusive method, is a very useful tool to obtain the physical properties of cores (density, porosity, heterogeneities) and the fluids within the cores (saturation or concentration profiles). However, the concentration profiles obtained from diffusion experiments of solvent in oil sands were fluctuating and cannot be used to evaluate the diffusivity. In order to solve the problem, during the data processing of CAT scanning, porosity heterogeneity of porous media and volume changes on mixing are considered to improve the accuracy of concentration profiles dramatically. Subsequently, the diffusivity of hydrocarbon solvent in heavy oil saturated sands is determined based on an updated mathematical model, which considers porosity heterogeneity of porous media in the major diffusion direction and volume changes on mixing. Thus, the impact of porosity heterogeneity of porous media on diffusivity determination of hydrocarbon solvent in heavy oil saturated sands is investigated. Introduction Recently, some novel processes of combining the benefits of steam and solvents in the recovery of heavy oil and bitumen have been developed, such as: Expanding Solvent SAGD [1] (ESSAGD), Solvent Aided Process [2] (SAP), Liquid Addition to Steam for Enhancing Recovery [3] (LASER), Steam Alternating Solvent process [4] (SAS). These solvent-assisted processes are aimed at improving oil rates and oil-to-steam ratio, and reducing energy and water consumption. Some of these processes have been field-tested successfully. In order to simulate these solventassisted processes numerically, the diffusivity of solvents in heavy oil saturated reservoir is required. In porous rocks, molecular diffusion takes place along tortuous paths. Therefore, the effective diffusivity De in the porous medium is smaller than the molecular diffusivity Do in the bulk fluids. For the estimation of effective diffusivity in porous solids, usually two empirical relationships are used. Equation 1 [5] gives a rough approximation to the diffusion coefficient in unconsolidated porous media. Equation (1) (Available in full paper) The second method involves an analogy between electrical conductivity and diffusion in porous media as equation 2 [6] shows. Equation (2) (Available in full paper) where F is the formation electrical resistivity factor and is the cementation factor. O assumes different values in different packings. Specifically, for unconsolidated packs, the value of the cementation factor is 1.3 [7]. This equation can be used for cemented rocks as well as unconsolidated packs. Because the porosity of cores is usually less than 0.4, the results based on these two relationships are very different. Besides, these equations are only approximations for the ratio of effective diffusivity De to molecular diffusivity Do. More accurate methods are needed to investigate the diffusivity of solvent in oil sands. Diffusivity of solvents in heavy oil or bitumen has been studied extensively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian International Petroleum ConferenceSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207