MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2506423189 · doi:10.1177/096739110701500401

Effect of Propylene Carbonate on Physical Properties of Wood Fibreboard Composite

2007· article· en· W2506423189 on OpenAlexaff
Arun Ghosh, Mohini Sain

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymers and Polymer Composites · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPropylene carbonateMaterials scienceComposite materialFlexural strengthComposite numberPolyvinyl alcoholUltimate tensile strengthCarbonateChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of propylene carbonate as an accelerator on the mechanical performance and dimensional stability of composites made from wood fibre bonded with wood resin and urea formaldehyde resin was investigated. The results demonstrated that the mechanical performance of the composite fibreboard cured at a relatively low temperature (e.g., 180 °C) could be markedly enhanced by addition of propylene carbonate. Composites cured at higher temperatures (e.g., 200 °C or 220 °C) and/or in presence of propylene carbonate, exceeded the minimum physical properties specified by ANSI-AHA. The addition of 3% propylene carbonate (by weight, based on total fibre and resin content) could optimise the physical properties of the composites. The tensile stress parallel-to-the-surface and the flexural strength and stiffness of the composites increased in presence of propylene carbonate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolymers and Polymer CompositesSame topicCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysisFrench-language works237,207