MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2506629113 · doi:10.1057/9781137331304_14

Collective Creation in Quebec

2013· book-chapter· en· W2506629113 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean-Marc Larrue

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCountercultureFrenchCollective identityIdeologyAssertionMovement (music)Political sciencePoliticsHistoryPolitical economySociologyGender studiesAestheticsLawArtArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although collective creation transcended national borders and became a truly international movement, the various parts of the world where it emerged did not experience it in the same fashion, nor did the movement have the same impact or meaning in different regional contexts. Associated with the counterculture movement that began with the Algerian War (1954– 62), peaking with the May’68 upheavals, and ending with the withdrawal of all American troops from Vietnam in 1975, collective creation in Quebec was also part of an unprecedented liberation movement involving Francophone Quebecers. This movement manifested itself in Quebec in two ways: the assertion of the distinctive character of Francophone identity, and a search for greater political, economic, and cultural independence in an environment dominated by Anglophones across Canada and the rest of North America. This merging of counterculture ideology with postcolonial dynamics was the source of the particular nature of Francophone collective creation in Quebec, and it accounts for its historical importance.1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0140.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooksSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207