MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2506695343 · doi:10.1057/9781137391803_5

Rousseau’s Paradigm

2014· book-chapter· en· W2506695343 on OpenAlexaff
Ted Newell

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRousseau and Enlightenment Thought
Canadian institutionsCrandall University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReverencePresuppositionExposition (narrative)DutyBourgeoisiePoliticsPhilosophyEpistemologySociologyAestheticsPolitical scienceLawArtTheologyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exposition shows a central “reverence” and appropriate “duty” for the basic presuppositional (“religious”) values informing Rousseau’s educational and political platforms. Rousseau disagrees with empiricist view that self-preservation or bourgeois comfort is enough to integrate human beings in a harmonious society. Because Rousseau thinks human beings to be essentially good, he proposes a progressive movement to realize a perfect society. Émile, Rousseau’s educational novel, is a progressive utopian presentation which inspires or repels educators depending on their presuppositions. Rousseau’s “reverence” for human perfectibility explains his “duties”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.023
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooksSame topicRousseau and Enlightenment ThoughtFrench-language works237,207