MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2506695343 · doi:10.1057/9781137391803_5

Rousseau’s Paradigm

2014· book-chapter· en· W2506695343 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRousseau and Enlightenment Thought
Canadian institutionsCrandall University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReverencePresuppositionExposition (narrative)DutyBourgeoisiePoliticsPhilosophyEpistemologySociologyAestheticsPolitical scienceLawArtTheologyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exposition shows a central “reverence” and appropriate “duty” for the basic presuppositional (“religious”) values informing Rousseau’s educational and political platforms. Rousseau disagrees with empiricist view that self-preservation or bourgeois comfort is enough to integrate human beings in a harmonious society. Because Rousseau thinks human beings to be essentially good, he proposes a progressive movement to realize a perfect society. Émile, Rousseau’s educational novel, is a progressive utopian presentation which inspires or repels educators depending on their presuppositions. Rousseau’s “reverence” for human perfectibility explains his “duties”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it