MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2506750285 · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-610-8_7

Using Viral Vectors to Study the Memory Trace in Mice

2013· book-chapter· en· W2506750285 on OpenAlexaff
Asim J. Rashid, Yan Chen, Sheena A. Josselyn

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuromethods · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCREBNeuroscienceArc (geometry)EngramBiologyPopulationMemory consolidationEncoding (memory)Biological neural networkMemory formationCell biologyTranscription factorPsychologyGeneHippocampusMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ability to identify neurons that are involved in the acquisition and encoding of a specific memory can facilitate efforts to understand the neuronal and circuit mechanisms that underlie memory formation. In this chapter, we outline a method whereby a population of neurons in the lateral amygdala (LA) that is involved in encoding of a conditioned fear memory can be identified. Using viral-mediated gene delivery, expression levels of the transcription factor CREB (cAMP/Ca 2+ responsive element binding protein) can be transiently increased in a subpopulation of neurons in the LA in vivo, thereby biasing those neurons towards becoming part of a memory trace. The preferential involvement of those neurons can be assessed using a technique, known as catFISH, in which the localized expression of mRNA for the immediate early gene arc after memory formation can be detected and compared to those neurons expressing virally delivered CREB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.261
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuromethodsSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207