MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2506812016 · doi:10.22456/1982-1654.58362

Cena e Computadores: fricções para uma pedagogia do teatro expandido

2016· article· pt· W2506812016 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInformática na educação teoria & prática · 2016
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArts and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A nova perspectiva na arte contemporânea apresenta objetos artísticos que se utilizam do computador ou de máquinas analógicas para propor diferentes formas de apreciação. No teatro, observamos uma forte tendência no uso da tecnologia do vídeo em cenários, projeções em corpos e performances interativas. Com uma perspectiva diferente, na pedagogia do teatro ainda trabalhamos com um forte vinculo à cena clássica, baseando sua estruturação em jogos teatrais. Este artigo pretende discutir o atual estado do teatro e tecnologia nas aulas de teatro do Brasil. Nossa questão central é baseada a articulação entre a tendência em arte contemporânea e as reais possibilidades em nossas aulas de teatro. Para nosso suporte teórico, nos articularemos as ideias de Philip Auslander , e sua atenção sobre o novo espectador imerso no contexto da mídia digital, Michael Anderson e as atuais circunstâncias das tecnologias nas aulas de teatro, em diálogo com o pesquisadores da arte educação brasileiros. Palavras chave: Pedagogia do Teatro, Arte Educação e Formação de Professores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it