Derechos Humanos y Penas Radicales: ¿Crítica o Justificación? La Recepción del Derecho Internacional Humanitario en el Código Penal Colombiano (Human Rights and Radical Punishment: Criticism or Justification?The Reception of International Humanitarian...)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article discusses the relationship between human rights and criminal law, focusing on the matter of the penalties enshrined in the criminal laws. Through the conceptualization of radical punishment this paper seeks to observe those penalties involving a fundamental contradiction with the positive values that a society in general and particularly the criminal law system seeks to safeguard through punishment, and that are at the same time radically indifferent to the right to (biological and social) life of the individual responsible for a crime. In this regard, the paper offers some considerations on how to reconstitute the criminal law to suit human rights’ values while maintaining a critical attitude of the latter rather than a justificatory approach. In this line of thought, the article focuses on the reception of the International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in the Colombian Penal Code reflecting on the operation of radical punishment before punitive scales as well as the jus philosophical fundament. Este artículo aborda la relación entre los derechos humanos y el derecho punitivo, centrándose en el aspecto de las penas consagradas en el ordenamiento penal. A través de la conceptualización de las penas radicales este trabajo busca observar aquellas penas que están en contradicción fundamental con los valores positivos que la sociedad en general y, particularmente, el sistema de derecho criminal, pretende salvaguardar a través de la punición, y que son radicalmente indiferentes al derecho a la vida (biológica y social) del individuo declarado responsable por un delito. En este sentido se trazan algunas reflexiones sobre cómo reconstituir el derecho penal para adecuarlo a los valores propios de los derechos humanos, conservando una aptitud crítica antes que justificativa de estos últimos. Atendiendo a esta reflexión, el presente artículo estudia la recepción del Derecho Internacional Humanitario (DIH) en el Código Penal colombiano a través de un estudio de las escalas punitivas así como del sustento iusfilosófico de las mismas, para reflexionar sobre la operación de las penas radicales frente a la legislación. DOWNLOAD THIS PAPER FROM SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2627717
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".