MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2507244647 · doi:10.1002/rnc.3626

Adaptive stationary consensus protocol for a class of high‐order nonlinear multiagent systems with jointly connected topologies

2016· article· en· W2507244647 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNetwork topologyNonlinear systemConsensusAffine transformationMulti-agent systemProtocol (science)Computer scienceConvergence (economics)Topology (electrical circuits)Class (philosophy)Control theory (sociology)Position (finance)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsComputer networkArtificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The leaderless consensus problem in a class of dynamic agents with high‐order input‐affine nonlinear models is studied. Based on communication of position information among the agents, an adaptive protocol is proposed that guarantees achieving consensus in the network in the presence of unknown parameters in the agents models. The network topology is considered undirected, which may not be connected constantly. Hence, by invoking the Cauchy convergence criterion, sufficient conditions to achieve consensus in the presence of jointly connected switching topologies are obtained. A numerical example for a team of single‐link flexible joint manipulators with forth‐order nonlinear models is provided to confirm the accuracy of the proposed consensus protocol. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it