Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este artículo se analizan un conjunto de poemas escritos por el autor cubano Antón Arrufat reunidos y publicados en sus libros Repaso final (1964) y Escrito en las puertas (1968). Además de rescatar estos textos que, debido a la proscripción sufrida por el autor desde 1968 hasta principios de los 80, han tenido muy poca circulación y escasa recepción crítica, la lectura que aquí se realiza busca señalar los desacoples entre la concepción de subjetividad que proponen estos poemas y aquella promovida por una política cultural estatal dirigida a la construcción de un sujeto moralmente superior, cuyo modelo se condensó en la figura del hombre nuevo guevariano. De esta manera este ensayo intenta contribuir al estudio de las complejas relaciones entre literatura y política durante los años inmediatamente posteriores al triunfo de la revolución cubana.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".