MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2507452886 · doi:10.1080/03155986.2016.1197541

Advances in profit-driven order promising for make-to-stock environments – a case study with a Canadian softwood lumber manufacturer

2016· article· en· W2507452886 on OpenAlex
Rodrigo Cambiaghi Azevedo, Sophie D’Amours, Mikael Rönnqvist

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueINFOR Information Systems and Operational Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfitability indexProfit (economics)SoftwoodStock (firearms)Order (exchange)MarketingFor profitIndustrial organizationComputer scienceEconomicsBusinessOperations researchEngineeringMicroeconomicsFinanceMechanical engineeringPulp and paper industry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Profit-driven order promising mechanisms have been receiving increasing attention from academia and practitioners in recent years. In spite of the recent advances in the field, its application in practice still remains a challenge. One of the most interesting approaches currently discussed is called aATP (allocated available-to-promise). In this paper, we propose some advances for current state-of-the-art aATP constructions in make-to-stock environments, mainly adapting it to commodity products sold through spot markets. Practical situations are tested through simulations supported by real data obtained from a major softwood manufacturer in Canada. Examples show that the proposed approach can increase the profitability of the producer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it