Abstract 8: Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Program Participation and Clinical Outcomes for Medicare Beneficiaries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Get With The Guidelines (GWTG)-Stroke is a national, hospital-based quality improvement program developed by the American Heart Association. While studies have shown a beneficial effect of hospital participation in GWTG-Stroke upon processes of care, whether there are associated improvements in clinical outcomes has not been previously investigated. Methods: From among all acute care US hospitals, we matched 366 hospitals that joined the GWTG-Stroke program between April 2004 and December 2007, with 366 hospitals that did not. Matching was based on ischemic stroke case volume, calendar year, baseline hospital post-stroke 1-year all-cause mortality rates, teaching status, and geographic region. Outcomes of all acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients admitted to the study hospitals were abstracted from the CMS administrative claims database (65 years and older). Outcomes at matched hospitals were compared in the PRE-GWTG-Stroke period (-540 to -181 days before program launch), RUN-UP period (-180- to -1 day), EARLY period (0 to 180 days) and SUSTAINED period (181 to 540 days). Additional analysis was performed of the entire BEFORE (-540 to -1 days) and AFTER periods (0 to 540 days). The main analytical approach was stratified Cox proportional hazard modeling, with matched site ID at stratum. We adjusted for patient characteristics (age, gender, race, medical history) and hospital characteristics (rural vs. urban, # beds, annual IS discharges.) Results: The study analyzed 88,584 AIS admissions at the 366 GWTG-Stroke hospitals and 85,401 admissions at the 366 matched non-GWTG-Stroke hospitals. In adjusted analysis comparing BEFORE and AFTER periods, GWTG-Stroke hospitals achieved reduced 30 day mortality (30M - HR 0.911, p<0.0001), reduced 1 year mortality (1YM - HR 0.902, p<0.0001), reduced 30 day all-cause rehospitalization (HR 0.956, p=0.013), reduced 30 day stroke rehospitalization (HR 0.927, p=0.038), and reduced 1 year all-cause rehospitalization (HR 0.972, p=0.007). Conversely, matched, non-GWTG-Stroke hospitals showed only reduced 30M (HR 0.954, p=0.010) between the BEFORE and AFTER periods. Comparing the degree of change at GWTG-Stroke with non-GWTG Stroke hospitals, there were greater improvements in discharge to home (DCH), 30M, and 1YM at GWTG-Stroke hospitals in each of the intervention periods: EARLY: DCH, HR 1.090, p<0.0001; 30M, HR 0.894, p=0.0006; 1YM, HR 0.889, p<0.0001; SUSTAINED: DCH, HR 1.097, p<0.0001; 30M, HR 0.934, p=0.004; 1YM, HR 0.918, p<0.0001. Conclusions: Hospitals joining the GWTG-Stroke quality improvement program between 2004-2008 achieved significantly greater improvement in stroke patient outcomes than matched hospitals not joining the program, with lower all-cause mortality at 30 days and 1 year and higher rates of discharge directly to home.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".