MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2507502519 · doi:10.1590/1415-47142000004006

Ideologia e psicopatologia: uma discussão fenomenológica transcultural

2000· article· pt· W2507502519 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Latinoamericana de Psicopatologia Fundamental · 2000
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsDow Chemical (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyPhilosophyPsychoanalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este estudo tem como objetivo discutir a relação entre ideologia e psicopatologia com base na perspectiva de homem mundano colocada pela fenomenologia de Merleau-Ponty (¡964,1966,1970). Na medida em que esta entende o homem existindo em mútua constituição com o mundo, dá lugar a uma leitura da psicopatologia também como emergente em constituição com o mundo, ou a cultura (Moreira, 1993, 1999; Moreira & Aramburu, 1999). São examinados alguns exemplos de ideologias ou formas de pensar na cultura contemporânea que levam ao surgimento de patologias mentais, assim como pesquisas de caráter transcultural (Draguns, 1990; Cooper & Sartorius, 1991 ; Schumaker, 1996) que mostram a estreita relação entre ideologia e psicopatologia além de publicações feno menológicas sobre a relação entre psicoterapia, psicopatologia e cultura (Tatossian, 1997; Doukhan, 1998; Dörr, 1995).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it