MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2507638008 · doi:10.1021/acsomega.6b00100

Twist–Bend Stage in the Relaxation of Sheared Chiral Nematic Suspensions of Cellulose Nanocrystals

2016· article· en· W2507638008 on OpenAlexafffund
Derek G. Gray, Xiaoyue Mu

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Omega · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLiquid crystalMaterials scienceCelluloseEvaporationChemical engineeringTexture (cosmology)Aqueous solutionPhase (matter)Chemical physicsComposite materialOrganic chemistryChemistryThermodynamicsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aqueous suspensions of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs), prepared from natural cellulose by sulfuric acid hydrolysis, form stable chiral nematic suspensions above a critical CNC concentration. The chiral nematic organization may be preserved in films prepared from the suspensions by evaporation. However, shrinkage, gelation, and shear during film formation impair the optical properties of the dry film. In this article, we report an unusual behavior for a sample in which gelation occurred before the sample reached iridescent pitch values. In attempting to decouple changes in texture due to evaporation from those due to shear relaxation effects for this sample, we observed a transitory nematic-like texture that was induced by shear during the preparation of the sample for polarized light microscopy. We propose that the transition between chiral nematic and nematic structures involves a twist-bend-like intermediate and not an untwisting of the chiral nematic phase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.241

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS OmegaSame topicAdvanced Cellulose Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207