MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2507651753

On coded modulation for optical transmission

2016· article· en· W2507651753 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptical Fiber Communication Conference · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsInfineon Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForward error correctionComputer scienceModulation (music)Decoding methodsEncoding (memory)Link adaptationOffset (computer science)Transmission (telecommunications)Electronic engineeringNonlinear systemTelecommunicationsComputer networkFadingEngineeringArtificial intelligencePhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

➤ Multi-dimensional coded modulation is useful in: • Filling the capacity gaps in a way to trade off between capacity and reach. • Enhancing the nonlinear tolerance by special encoding constraints. ➤ Most SD FEC schemes achieve the hard-decoding Shannon limit (or slightly better), there is still 1 to 1.5 dB worth mining. ➤ While the performance of many of the high-dimensional modulation formats examined is superior to conventional formats at BERs in the region of 10-3 and 10-2, the use of modern strong FEC codes remains a topic for further investigation. ➤ In general, gains in noise tolerance may be offset by worse nonlinear performance for novel formats, and detailed analysis of nonlinear performance is essential. ➤ Research activity on coded modulation will continue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it