MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2507678252 · doi:10.1139/cjb-2016-0058

Permineralized infructescence from the Cerro del Pueblo Formation, Upper Cretaceous, Coahuila, Mexico

2016· article· en· W2507678252 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sergio R.S. Cevallos-Ferriz, M Vázquez-Rueda

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Diversity and Evolution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyEndospermBractBotanyGenusCretaceousExtant taxonBiological dispersalInflorescencePaleontologyEvolutionary biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Permineralized infructescences are described from the Cerro del Pueblo Formation, Coahuila, Mexico. Morphological and anatomical observations of 584 infructescences support the identification and reconstruction of an infructescence, with fruit developed as nutlets. The fruit are each surrounded by bracts, and have a persistent style and stigma. They comprise a woody exocarp composed of macrosclereids, and mesocarp and endocarp with layers of brachysclereids. The seeds are fusiform with a thin seed coat. Seeds contain a distal hollow chamber, probably involved in dispersal, and an embryo with two cotyledons with probable helobial endosperm. The fruit and seed characters of the fossil do not correspond with an extant genus or family, thus, a new genus and species is proposed, Patocarpus coahuilensis gen. et sp. nov. Cevallos-Ferriz and Vázquez-Rueda, and is interpreted to be an extinct member of Proteales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicPlant Diversity and EvolutionFrench-language works237,207