MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2507692758 · doi:10.4000/cdlm.8071

La principauté de Monaco, la Méditerranée et la paix sous le règne du prince Albert Ier (1889-1922)

2015· article· fr· W2507692758 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean Rémy Bezias

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de la Méditerranée · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La principauté de Monaco a été, à la charnière des xixe et xxe siècles, un centre de diffusion du pacifisme, grâce à l’action d’Albert Ier. Cette action tire son origine des convictions humanistes du prince. Elle constitue le prolongement politique de son activité scientifique, au service du progrès humain. La volonté de faire de Monaco un pôle de rayonnement du pacifisme s’est concrétisée par la création de l’Institut international de la paix en 1903. Albert Ier s’est aussi voulu diplomate et homme d’influence, au service de la paix. Les négociations sur la question marocaine en 1905 marquent l’apogée de son rôle de médiateur, entre la France et l’Allemagne. Après la Première Guerre mondiale Albert Ier subit la déconvenue de se voir refuser l’entrée de son pays dans la Société des Nations. Il doit se contenter d’un relatif succès dans le domaine de la coopération scientifique, par la mise en place de la Commission de la Méditerranée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers de la MéditerranéeSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207