MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2507863352 · doi:10.3138/uram.24.2.117

Mediate Reality and Popular Culture: Toward a Phenomenology of Ultimate Reality

2001· article· en· W2507863352 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Ronald Glasberg

Bibliographic record

VenueUltimate Reality and Meaning · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMediationEthnologyPhilosophyPolitical scienceSociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'A. commence ici par une discussion methodologique, puis il donne ses raisons du choix d'un certain aspect (la tradition sacramentelle dans le catholicisme) de la culture populaire. Il propose ensuite un court expose du comment son exemple choisi fonctionne en fait dans sa capacite de mediation. Il conclut avec des recommandations sur la maniere de developper l'etude de la realite de mediation pour prendre en compte ce qu'il faut considerer comme un serieux danger pour la civilisation occidentale, a savoir son incapacite a soutenir des formes adequates de mediation en ce qui concerne la realite ultime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltimate Reality and MeaningSame topicHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityFrench-language works237,207