MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2507925422 · doi:10.5539/ijc.v8n4p15

Determination of Uranium and Thorium in the Industrial Phosphoric Acid Using X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry with Wavelength Dispersive (WDXRF)

2016· article· en· W2507925422 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohamed Guitouni

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicRadioactivity and Radon Measurements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThoriumUraniumChemistryPhosphoric acidX-ray fluorescenceWavelengthFluorescenceX-rayCoefficient of variationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)RadiochemistryNuclear chemistryEnvironmental chemistryChromatographyMetallurgyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>The method of determination for uranium and thorium in the industrial phosphoric acid by wavelength-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (WDXRF) responds positively to all the validation tests and can be adopted for the dosage for these elements. It is clear that the procedure of the proposed method is simple and requires less time to complete the analysis. The concentration for uranium and thorium in the Tunisian phosphoric acid is in the order of 22 ppm for uranium with a coefficient of variation of 0.77% and of about 4 ppm for thorium with a coefficient of variation of 1.37%.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ChemistrySame topicRadioactivity and Radon MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207