MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2507979704

Are there alternatives for methyl bromide

2007· article· en· W2507979704 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mirko Ivanović, Miroslav Ivanović

Bibliographic record

VenueBiljni lekar · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Disease Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFumigationChloropicrinMontreal ProtocolBromideEnvironmental scienceOzone layerChemistryOzoneOzone depletionWaste managementAgronomyOrganic chemistryEngineeringBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Methyl bromide has been used for soil fumigation more than forty years. Brome from methyl bromide reaches atmosphere and cause ozone layer depletition and formation of ozone hole. By the Montreal Protocol adopted 1992, this fumigant must be phased out by 2005 in Western countries and 2015 in developing countries. Several chemicals which are used for soil fumigation alone or in combination were tested as possible alternatives to methyl bromide. At the present the best alternatives is mixture of chloropicrin and 1,3 dichlorpropen. This mixture are not sufficiently efficient to weeds control, that is way they are less efficient than methyl bromide. This pepper gave the presentation of research of chemical and no chemical alternatives of paste control in soil for agricultural plants cultivation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiljni lekarSame topicPlant Disease Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207