MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2507979766 · doi:10.1139/cjb-2016-0035

Early diverging asterids of the Late Cretaceous: <i>Suciacarpa starrii</i> gen. et sp. nov. and the initial radiation of Cornales

2016· article· en· W2507979766 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Brian A. Atkinson

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Diversity and Evolution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoculeBiologyExtant taxonAnatomyGenusBotanyCretaceousPaleontologyEvolutionary biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two permineralized cornalean fruits from the Campanian of the state of Washington in the northwestern United States were studied using the cellulose acetate peel technique. One specimen was reconstructed three-dimensionally using ImageJ software. Fruits are ellipsoidal and consist of valvate endocarps. Valves are restricted to the apical third of the endocarp. Endocarps are tetralocular and each locule is crescent-shaped in cross section. The valve tissue consists of isodiametric sclereids and secretory cavities. Septae are composed of transversely elongated sclereids and secretory cavities. In each septum there are roughly two rows of vascular bundles that extend the length of the fruit. There is one apically attached seed per locule. These fossil fruits display a unique mosaic of characters indicative of Cornaceae, Nyssaceae, Davidiaceae, and Mastixiaceae, but not conforming to any one of these extant families. Therefore, they are assigned to a new genus and species within Cornales, Suciacarpa starrii gen. et sp. nov. The novel combination of characters of Suciacarpa sheds light on the early evolution of Cornales and supports previous phylogenetic hypotheses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicPlant Diversity and EvolutionFrench-language works237,207