MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2507982111 · doi:10.1111/jgs.14427

Elderly Adults with Late‐Onset Ulcerative Colitis Tend to Have Atypical, Milder Initial Clinical Presentations but Higher Surgical Rates and Mortality: A Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Study

2016· letter· en· W2507982111 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wei‐Chen Lin, Chien‐Chih Tung, Hung‐Hsin Lin, Chun‐Chi Lin, Chen‐Wang Chang, Hsu‐Heng Yen, Chiao‐Hsiung Chuang, Wen‐Hung Hsu, Wen‐Sy Tsai, Horng‐Yuan Wang, Jen‐Kou Lin, Shu‐Chen Wei, Jau‐Min Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2016
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUlcerative colitisInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseaseIncidence (geometry)Internal medicineAge of onsetRetrospective cohort studyPopulationColitisYoung adultPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: There is considerable controversy over the clinical presentation and prognosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) in elderly adults. An earlier study found a prevalence of left colitis over extensive forms,1 whereas the latest studies show that proctitis and left-sided UC are more common in elderly adults.2, 3 Some studies suggest that there is no association between mortality and age,4 whereas others have found greater risk of death in elderly adults.5 Moreover, most of these studies are from Western countries. Because the aging population and the incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease have recently begun to increase rapidly in Taiwan,6 this multicenter study was conducted to examine the clinical features and outcomes of UC in older adults in Taiwan. This was a retrospective study conducted at seven medical centers in Taiwan and included clinical data from 1991 to 2014. Late-onset UC was defined as onset of UC after the age of 60. Demographic characteristics, UC-related medication use, extent of disease, severity at diagnosis, greatest severity during the disease course, disease outcomes (hospitalizations for colitis flares, surgery, death) were recorded and analyzed. UC location was classified using the Montreal Classification System,7 and clinical severity was categorized using the modified Truelove and Witts Severity Index.8 T-tests were two-tailed, and P < .05 indicated statistical significance. Five hundred thirty-six individual with UC were identified, 14.4% (n = 77) had late-onset UC. The most common age for UC onset was the fourth decade, and no bimodal distribution was shown in this cohort. There was a difference in clinical presentation between individuals with early- and late-onset UC. Individuals with early-onset UC tended to present with the typical symptoms of UC, such as diarrhea (P = .03) and abdominal pain (P = .04) (Table 1), but the group with late-onset UC had less-typical symptoms, such as constipation (P = .001) and fever (P = .006). Diagnosis took significantly longer for individuals with late-onset UC (2.2 ± 4.5 years) than for those with early-onset UC (0.4 ± 0.8 years) (P < .001). The group with early-onset UC was more likely to have severe activity at initial diagnosis (32.4%) than the group with late-onset UC (16.8%) (P = .001), although there was no significant difference in highest severity over the entire clinical course. Individuals with late-onset UC were more likely to be smokers (10.4%) than those with early-onset UC (4.1%, P = .001). Individuals with late-onset UC were more likely to use suppository type medications and less likely to use intravenous corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and biologics. The number of admissions was similar between the two groups, whereas the rate of surgery was significantly higher in the group with late-onset UC (0.24) than in that with early-onset UC (00.18) (P = .04). Mortality (P < .001) and rates of sepsis (P = .009) were higher in the group with late onset. These results demonstrate that individuals with late-onset UC tend to have atypical presentations and milder severity at initial diagnosis, which may result in a longer time to diagnosis than in those with early-onset UC. A similar phenomenon has been previously reported.2, 3, 9 Doctors should be more aggressive in making an earlier diagnosis in elderly adults. Individuals with late-onset UC had higher rates of sepsis and surgery and greater mortality even when they had initial mild disease severity than those with early-onset UC and similar severity over the whole disease course. Individuals with late-onset UC were less likely to use intravenous corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and biologics. The group with late onset had higher rates of surgery, probably because they received less-aggressive treatment and inadequate control of UC activity. Age is a known risk factor for sepsis,10 and treatment with immunomodulators and biologics confer a risk of infection that may be more pertinent in elderly adults.10 All of the above indicate that comorbidities and infection control are important concerns when caring for elderly adults with UC. It is hoped that the information provided herein will decrease mortality and rates of sepsis in this group. In conclusion, individuals with late-onset UC more often have atypical clinical presentations and milder illness severity at initial diagnosis, which could result in delay of diagnosis. Moreover, elderly adults have higher mortality and rates of surgery. Medications to control UC activity should be cautiously adjusted and sepsis risk avoider, thereby improving outcomes in individuals with late-onset UC. Conflict of Interest: The authors have no financial or any other kind of personal conflicts with this paper. Author Contributions: Lin WC, Tung CC, Lin HH, Lin CC, Chang CW, Yen HH, Chuang CH, Hsu WH, Tsai W: acquisition of data, drafting the manuscript, statistical analysis. Wang HY, Lin JK, Wong JM: analysis and interpretation of data, critical revision of manuscript for important intellectual content. Wei SC: protocol design, drafting the manuscript, critical revision of manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Sponsor's Role: None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Geriatrics SocietySame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207