MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Understanding the Demulsification of Water-in-Diluted Bitumen Froth Emulsions

2015· article· en· W2507991132 on OpenAlexaff
Xianhua Feng, Jacqueline A. Behles

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsBaker Hughes (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemulsifierDiluentAsphaltTotal dissolved solidsEmulsionChemistryWettingChemical engineeringMaterials scienceChromatographyComposite materialOrganic chemistryEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Demulsification of water-in-diluted bitumen froth emulsions is greatly affected by the presence of solids in the emulsions. In this paper, the wettability, composition, and particle size distribution of the solids extracted from bitumen froth emulsions and diluted bitumen after demulsification, in the absence and presence of a demulsifier, were investigated using partitioning tests, X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy. It was found that the application of the demulsifier assisted in the removal of water-wet solids, with the main components of the solids in the diluted bitumen being siderite and clays. The median particle size of the solids ( D 50 ) was reduced from 8 μm in the bitumen froth emulsions to less than 2 μm in the diluted bitumen phase after the use of a demulsifier in the diluted bitumen froth treatment. The presence of fine solids in the diluted bitumen froth increased the water/bitumen interfacial tension and increased the difficulty of demulsification because the fines are biwettable and adsorb strongly at the water/bitumen interface. The effect of solids on diluent loss to the settled water and solids phase after demulsification was also studied using model emulsions. The diluent loss was found to increase with the solids content of the emulsions. At the same solids content and composition, the diluent losses increased with the fine solids content of the solids. The application of the demulsifier led to a greater diluent loss, and the loss increased with the demulsifier dosage. The results from the diluent loss studies revealed that diluent loss is caused by the adsorption of diluent on the solids. The target of demulsification of water-in-diluted bitumen froth emulsions is to achieve clean and dry diluted bitumen (<1.5% water and <0.6% solids) and to keep the bitumen/diluent losses to the settled water and solids phase minimized. In addition to dewatering, the demulsifiers must change the wettability of the solids and/or disperse the bitumen/solids aggregates to reach lower bitumen/diluent losses and keep a higher water and solids removal efficiency in the demulsification of water-in-diluted bitumen froth emulsions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207